Plusieurs élements se superposent sur la page d'acceuil (je ne suis pas allé plus loin) et la lecture devient donc quasiment impossible. (Firefox sur Win XP SP1) Sinon, j'utilise Firefox depuis lundi passé et je l'adore déjà... Dan Michels, Attaché parlementaire DÉI GRÉNG (Les Verts) 25, Rue Notre-Dame L-2240 Luxembourg T: (+352) 463740-26 F: (+352) 463743 Mobile: (+352) 021 233 121 Brent Frère <brent(a)bfrere.net> Sent by: lilux-info-bounces(a)lilux.lu 24/10/2004 22:23 To ribeiro.paulo(a)gmail.com cc lilux-info(a)linux.lu Subject Re: [Lilux-info] Utopolis Website non-browsable with FireFox Paulo Ribeiro wrote: I quickly browsed it and it seems to work (with FireFox). You can also write a ad in various newspapers (such as Luxbazar) advising the use of Caramba.lu, which is OS agnostic, and their main concurrent in Luxembourg... -- Brent Frère Private e-mail: Brent(a)BFrere.net Postal address: 5, rue de Mamer L-8280 Kehlen Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg European Union Mobile: +352-021/29.05.98 Fax: +352-26.30.05.96 Home: +352-307.341 URL: http://BFrere.net If you have problem with my digital signature, please install the appropriate au thority certificate by browsing https://www.cacert.org/certs/root.crt. _______________________________________________ Lilux-info mailing list Lilux-info(a)lilux.lu http://lilux.lu/mailman/listinfo/lilux-info

Serge Marelli wrote: See here: http://www.homepages.lu/pu/extra/utopolis.png -pu

Actually, it's quite a funny effect :-) but once you (manage to) click on one of the links, it seems the other pages don't show the problem (which is why I didn't see it, I just right into the site :_) Sergio On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 00:37, Paulo Ribeiro wrote: -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Serge Marelli, Luxembourg E-mail : serge.marelli(a)linux.lu ---------------------------------------------------------------------- LiLux - http://www.lilux.lu/ Defending Innovation against Patent Inflation http://swpat.ffii.org/ Free Software Foundation - http//www.fsf.org/

Brent Frère wrote: I did: ***************************************************** Hi, I'd like to give you a small feedback on the above-mentionned site. -1- Display in Mozilla Some pages, such as the main one, don't correctly display in Mozilla, see for example: http://www.homepages.lu/pu/extra/utopolis.png . -2- Feedback In Mozilla again, when pressing the feedback link, it says: --- cut --- The site has been stopped because of an error in the application! We apologize for the inconvenience. Please contact support(a)bisnet.be so that we can solve this issue immediately. Thank you. --- cut --- -3- eMail address The above link "support(a)bisnet.be" should be preceeded by "email:", because this way it points to http://www.utopolis.lu/support@bisnet.be which fails. Regards, -pu *****************************************************

Paulo Ribeiro a écrit : everything is explained here : www.spreadfirefox.com Note : Firefox 1.0 Final is out november the 9th

Hi, [www.utopolis.lu not working in Mozilla] On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Serge Marelli wrote: I have no idea whether it's a Mozilla or server-side issue, but all I get here @work or @home is a frameset with the little text: "The site has been stopped because of an error in the application! We apologize for the inconvenience. Please contact support(a)bisnet.be so that we can solve this issue immediately. Thank you." I won't take the time to debug their site... Greets Eric

Hi, On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Brent Frère wrote: In that case it must be their site failing with Mozilla 1.6 (here @work - don't know by heart which version I've got at home) - in Konqueror the site displays also badly like the screenshot... I guess a pass through W3C's validator would show some errors... I'm running it right now, but it's extremely slow. Greets Eric

Hello, Pour ceux que ça intéresse... J'ai recherché un peu ce qui causait cet affreux display sous FireFox et voici mes conclusions. J'ai ajouté le code de mes test pour ceux qui veulent vérifier. Je suis pas une bête en html et encore moins en CSS, alors je me trompe peut-être… L'erreur est due au CSS et a l'interprétation d’un certain paramètre d’une classe. En effet chaque film est représenté par un tag <div> qui a une classe (.content ou .content_no_url dans le fichier style.css) associée. Cette classe a un paramètre ‘height’ fixé à 200px resp. 40px. Il semble que les butineurs se différentient par l'interprétation de ce champ. IE a l'air d'augmenter la hauteur s'il y a du contenu alors que FF se tient strictement aux pixels retenus par le développeur; ce qui fait, ici, des débordements. Par contre je ne sais lequel des deux a le bon comportement...enfin à mon avis c FF ... --- style.css: .darkborderbottom { border-bottom: 3px solid #466BA2; } .content_no_url { height: 40px; background-color:#558ABD; } --- uto.html <html> <head> <link href="style.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /> </head> <body> <div class="content_no_url darkborderbottom"> <table> <tr><td>Prabelli</td></tr> <tr><td>Scala</td></tr> <tr><td>Sura</td></tr> </table> </div> <div class="content_no_url darkborderbottom"> <img src="http://www.utopolis.lu/images/site/Posters/long-way-home.jpg"> Long way home <p> A Lower East Side, à New York, en plein été, ... </p> </div> </body> </html> (versions super épurée de leurs fichiers top.aspx (enfin son rendu) et style.css) En supprimant de leur fichier style.css deux lignes (dans les deux classes concernées) le site devient tout de suite plus lisible... Voili.. Si personne n'a rien a ajouter, je vais le leur envoyer ... @+ Paulo [Paulo Ribeiro]