Hi all,
my two cents on translation software, as this is a topic for the
Creative Commons community, which went for Pootle instead of Rosetta
for the reasons below:
cheers, patrick, cc-lu
Have you considered using Mark Shuttleworth's
Rosetta system at
launchpad.net? That's what he's using for Ubuntu, and I understand that
Rosetta is supposed to be very good and well-maintained. They have a lot
of plans for that project, so CC could benefit from the effort Canonical,
Inc., plans to put into that.
We did consider Rosetta. It is a very nice looking tool, and has lots
of desirable features. That said, we chose Pootle for several reasons:
* It has all the features we really need -- through the web editting,
direct PO file manipulation, user permissions, multiple projects, etc
* We could set it up in an afternoon with some help from Dwayne; in
contrast I tried to configure Rosetta for ccPublisher last week to give
it a try. It requires that you upload your .pot files and they are
imported by an admin. Ours are still sitting in the queue (until I
delete them momentarily). So a > 7 day turn around doesn't seem worth
the additional features which we don't need.
* Pootle is Open Source, Rosetta is not. I don't care about degrees of
freedom (ie, GPL v MIT v ...), but the ability to figure out what's
going on when problems occur is important to me. I'm not questioning
Ubuntu or Canonical's support for Open Source development; to the
contrary, they're doing amazing work, and as such are very busy (see: >
1 week turn around). So I like to be able to fix it myself if necessary.
* Adding new projects is trivial
So its really not any one thing -- if the import had happened
auto-magically, it would probably have been a much more difficult
decision. That said, I'm incredibly happy with Pootle and think it will
be a good choice for us in the long term.
Nathan
On 05/07/06, Georges Toth <georges(a)norm.lu> wrote:
Can I use it in linux too or why do you post that link
here ? :-)
To reverse engineer the pack and port the Pack to a proper OS of course!
:-)
I can't test it by myself...but I "heard" that is was of no good
quality...or
at least a previous version of it.
Well anyway...there's a large project run by the ubuntu guys called ROSETTA.
You can translate via a webpage about any free software you like.
So if you want to start translating stuff, I guess that page is the way to go.
Reverse Engineering is probably a bigger effort than creating templates and
start translating.
--
regards,
Georges Toth
_______________________________________________
Lilux-info mailing list
Lilux-info(a)lilux.lu
http://lilux.lu/mailman/listinfo/lilux-info