3 Jun
2004
3 Jun
'04
7:32 p.m.
A few days ago, I believe someone was speaking about Coditel's internet
services. For those who have it, what has been your experience with Coditel?
My primary concerns are 1) quality of the service (unexplained down time,
mail servers down, too many users on one shared segment...) and 22) does the
USB modem that they offer work with linux or would I have to go out and get
myself a nice little linksys or Cisco router?
Mike
3 Jun
3 Jun
8:39 p.m.
Hello,
My primary concerns are
1) quality of the service (unexplained down time, mail servers down,
too many users on one shared segment...)
Well, until last week's cock-up, I never had to complain about their
service.
Once in a while they have short routing problems, but nothing major.
The only annoying thing is that all their traffic still goes through
Brussels ... and when I open my browser, I end up on google.be ... in
dutch !
2) does the USB modem that they offer work with linux
or would I have
to go out and get myself a nice little linksys or Cisco router?
The modem they provided me with is equiped with both USB and ethernet:
http://www.terayon.com/tools/static_page/view.html?phase=show&id=106922…
... and works like a charm.
I was already updating my machines while their technician was still in
my livingroom ... ;-)
At work, we use their service (with fixed IP) for one of our customer
and a Netscreen firewall. Works fine as well.
A+
Patrick
4 Jun
4 Jun
6:10 a.m.
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 10:39:20PM +0200, Patrick LEMMERS wrote:
--
Pascal Steichen
pascal.steichen(a)linux.lu
Lilux ASBL
www.lilux.lu
" Linux is like a woman, hard to understand
But very nice once you get under the hood. "
Hello,
That as nothing to do with routing ! You should check your browser settings I think. There
must be dutch as default language setted somewhere.
My primary concerns are
1) quality of the service (unexplained down time, mail servers down,
too many users on one shared segment...)
Well, until last week's cock-up, I never had to complain about their
service.
Once in a while they have short routing problems, but nothing major.
The only annoying thing is that all their traffic still goes through
Brussels ... and when I open my browser, I end up on google.be ... in
dutch ! 2) does the USB modem that they offer work with
linux or would I have
to go out and get myself a nice little linksys or Cisco router?
The modem they provided me with is equiped with both USB and ethernet:
http://www.terayon.com/tools/static_page/view.html?phase=show&id=106922…
... and works like a charm.
I was already updating my machines while their technician was still in
my livingroom ... ;-)
At work, we use their service (with fixed IP) for one of our customer
and a Netscreen firewall. Works fine as well.
A+
Patrick
_______________________________________________
Lilux-help mailing list
Lilux-help(a)lilux.lu
http://lilux.lu/mailman/listinfo/lilux-help 
10:51 a.m.
Indeed there is a possibility to select prefered languages in a web
browser. However the problem here is not this one.
Google proposes also to set a cookie that contains your preferences
(click on preferencies on the main page).
The real problem here is indeed related to routing. By using a
belgian-issued range of IP addresses (and this be routed through
Belgium), the customers appears as being in Belgium as reported by it's
source IP address. Thus, Google proposes by default dutch as language,
even if french is spoken in two third of the country and that german is
also an official language in Belgium.
Pascal Steichen a écrit :
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 10:39:20PM +0200, Patrick
LEMMERS wrote:
--
Brent Frère
Private e-mail: Brent(a)BFrere.net
Postal address: 5, rue de Mamer
L-8280 Kehlen
Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg
European Union
Mobile: +352-021/29.05.98
Fax: +352-26.30.05.96
Home: +352-307.341
URL: http://BFrere.net
Hello,
That as nothing to do with routing ! You should check your browser settings I think. There
must be dutch as default language setted somewhere.
My primary concerns are
1) quality of the service (unexplained down time, mail servers down,
too many users on one shared segment...)
Well, until last week's cock-up, I never had to complain about their
service.
Once in a while they have short routing problems, but nothing major.
The only annoying thing is that all their traffic still goes through
Brussels ... and when I open my browser, I end up on google.be ... in
dutch !
2) does the USB modem that they offer work with
linux or would I have
to go out and get myself a nice little linksys or Cisco router?
The modem they provided me with is equiped with both USB and ethernet:
http://www.terayon.com/tools/static_page/view.html?phase=show&id=106922…
... and works like a charm.
I was already updating my machines while their technician was still in
my livingroom ... ;-)
At work, we use their service (with fixed IP) for one of our customer
and a Netscreen firewall. Works fine as well.
A+
Patrick
_______________________________________________
Lilux-help mailing list
Lilux-help(a)lilux.lu
http://lilux.lu/mailman/listinfo/lilux-help
11:47 a.m.
begin Friday 04 June 2004 12:51, Brent Frère quote:
Indeed there is a possibility to select prefered
languages in a web
browser. However the problem here is not this one.
Google proposes also to set a cookie that contains your preferences
(click on preferencies on the main page).
The real problem here is indeed related to routing. By using a
belgian-issued range of IP addresses (and this be routed through
Belgium), the customers appears as being in Belgium as reported by it's
source IP address. Thus, Google proposes by default dutch as language,
even if french is spoken in two third of the country and that german is
also an official language in Belgium.
Don't worry too badly about google.be; google is known to often screw
up the language.
Google.lu defaults to German, even though near 100% of Luxembourg
actually speaks Luxembourgish, and even though a sizeable amount of
the population (especially the older generations, who lived through
WWII) dislikes it to be lumped together with the Germans.
If Google had a minimum amount of political smartness, they'd have at
least chosen French as the default language for google.lu . Or even
better, they would have applied for a government grant to translate
Google into Luxembourgish ;-)
Alain
7:18 p.m.
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 01:47:20PM +0200, Alain Knaff wrote:
begin Friday 04 June 2004 12:51, Brent Frère quote:
Yeah this tends to be inn these days ;)
Indeed there is a possibility to select prefered
languages in a web
browser. However the problem here is not this one.
Google proposes also to set a cookie that contains your preferences
(click on preferencies on the main page).
The real problem here is indeed related to routing. By using a
belgian-issued range of IP addresses (and this be routed through
Belgium), the customers appears as being in Belgium as reported by it's
source IP address. Thus, Google proposes by default dutch as language,
even if french is spoken in two third of the country and that german is
also an official language in Belgium.
Don't worry too badly about google.be; google is known to often screw
up the language.
Google.lu defaults to German, even though near 100% of Luxembourg
actually speaks Luxembourgish, and even though a sizeable amount of
the population (especially the older generations, who lived through
WWII) dislikes it to be lumped together with the Germans.
If Google had a minimum amount of political smartness, they'd have at
least chosen French as the default language for google.lu . Or even
better, they would have applied for a government grant to translate
Google into Luxembourgish ;-)
Alain
--
Pascal Steichen
pascal.steichen(a)linux.lu
Lilux ASBL
www.lilux.lu
" Linux is like a woman, hard to understand
But very nice once you get under the hood. "
5 Jun
5 Jun
10:30 a.m.
New subject: Google.lu & German
Don't worry too badly about google.be; google is
known to often screw
up the language.
Google.lu defaults to German, even though near 100% of Luxembourg
actually speaks Luxembourgish, and even though a sizeable amount of
the population (especially the older generations, who lived through
WWII) dislikes it to be lumped together with the Germans.
If Google had a minimum amount of political smartness, they'd have at
least chosen French as the default language for google.lu . Or even
better, they would have applied for a government grant to translate
Google into Luxembourgish ;-)
It would be fine if Google would support Luxembourgish. But please don't
blame Google for it!!! Our europhile governement didn't even manage to
established our UN (1984) recognised national language as a recognised
EU language, a right wich was attributed to ALL 10 new state members
(even Malta which is smaller than Luxembourg).
Besides, German is the only foreign language which is understood by ALL
native Luxemburger (wich cannot be said for French). Luxemburgers still
are all alphabetized in German und for the same reason every
luxemburgish policemen writes his reports in German. Look for
http://www.police.public.lu where some chosen police reports are
published by the Press department with only small modifications.
Compare the knowledge of the french language of a 7 year (or 80 year)
old luxemburgish citizen with her knowledge of the german language!!!
Besides, if you overlook the french words which we find in the
luxemburgish language, you will see that the fundamentals of the
luxemburgish language are quite similar to the german language. There is
no neutral, no accusative, no dative in the french language! This may
not help the average luxembourger to speak *correct* german (because too
much luxemburgishms are introduced in their German), but greatly helps
them to understand the language. Look at all the "Spillschoul" kids who
never learned German watching Sesamstraße & Co.
You can switch Google.lu to French, German is only the default.
the population (especially the older generations, who
lived through
WWII) dislikes it to be lumped together with the Germans.
Especially the older generations have *real* problems with French,
because the french language was not taught in Luxembourg during WWII.
If Google had a minimum amount of political smartness
So what? German is not only spoken by Germans, but also by people living
in Switzerland and Belgium (Eupen and St. Vith). Also never mind that
almost everywere in the world (even America) people will take you
immediately as a German when you open your mouth (Most foreign people
will not hear the difference between lux. and german if they are only
listening to the sound of the language and don't understand German or
Luxembourgish). So you will have to explain that the sound of your
language is not linked to the political conviction of your country
during WWII (Which will be the same for the swiss and belgian German
speakers and to some extend for the Netherlands).
Patrick Kaell
12:37 p.m.
New subject: Google.lu & German
What about English as the default language for google.lu and
German/French as an option, if translation to Luxembourgish is not
feasible? Most users of this list write in English for a good reason:
1. English is the language of the internet.
2. Luxembourg has over 7000 EU functionaries which aren't necessarly
speaking French. There are many foreign banks and I know that in
companies like SES, Good Year, Dupont, Husky, etc. English and not
French is the primary language. Here at Limpertsberg in the 4 appartment
house where I am living, in 2 appartments there are living swedish
people and in 1 appartment there are living british people.
Looking at Telecran, Revue and all the election material I got from all
the political parties which are all in German which only some "Slogans"
in Luxembourgish, it is *very* difficult to see why one should blame
Google for not having a "minimum" amount of political smartness.
Since we are not a minority but actors in our own sovereign country and
are able to choose the language we want (which unfortunately is often
not Luxembourgish), Google is completely right in choosing the same
language as almost all political parties choose to communicate to their
electors.
Regards, Patrick Kaell
8:47 p.m.
New subject: Google.lu & German
isn't customization one of the outstanding properties of linux that the
community is so proud of? so for the same reason that i personally
wouldn't bother much whether kde or gnome comes as default on my linux
distribution, i wouldn't care either about french or german being
default for google.lu, as long as one can customize it. besides,
computationally speaking, the differences between french and german are
so small that the same formalisms can be used to model both, so what? ;)
best regards,
kymon
ps: for those being curious about luxembourgish: according to the
"Section de linguistique, d'ethnologie et d'onomastique" of the
"Institut Royal Grand-Ducal De Luxembourg" at http://www.igd-leo.lu/ :
"When, pushed by incursions of the populations of Central Asia, the
nations of Germania moved westward, overthrowing on their turn the
frontiers and peoples of the Roman empire, the Franks settled down in
the Luxembourg area. Their language (Moselfränkisch) is at the origin of
the Luxembourg language."
note that a society using a -french- designation uses -english- to write
about the -germanic- origins of -luxembourgish-.
diversity and freedom of choice, let's be glad about it :)
6 Jun
6 Jun
5:26 p.m.
New subject: Google.lu & German
On Sat, 2004-06-05 at 12:30, Patrick Kaell wrote:
Besides, German is the only foreign language which is
understood by ALL
native Luxemburger (wich cannot be said for French).
Definitely NOT true!
but that is off topic and besides the point.
Serge
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Serge Marelli, Luxembourg
E-mail : serge.marelli(a)linux.lu
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LiLux, Luxembourg LUG : http://www.linux.lu/
Defending Innovation against Patent Inflation http://swpat.ffii.org/
4 Jun
4 Jun
10:28 p.m.
On Fri, 2004-06-04 at 08:10, Pascal Steichen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 10:39:20PM +0200, Patrick
LEMMERS wrote:
Has everything to do with routing... or rather Coditel's IP domain
Google relies on IP-source identification to decide whether you'll be
auto-redirected to google.com, google.FR, google.BE
In our case, Coditel's domain is somewhere in .be, so we're identified
as .be users... so it's "off to google.be you go"
I explained the use of google-cookies to bypass that.
Browser language selection made abso-f-ing-lutely no difference.
S
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Serge Marelli, Luxembourg
E-mail : serge.marelli(a)linux.lu
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LiLux, Luxembourg LUG : http://www.linux.lu/
Defending Innovation against Patent Inflation http://swpat.ffii.org/
The only annoying thing is that all their traffic
still goes through
Brussels ... and when I open my browser, I end up on google.be ... in
dutch !
That as nothing to do with routing ! You should check your browser settings I think.
There must be dutch as default language setted somewhere. 
8:13 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Well, until last week's cock-up, I never had to
complain about their
service.
except for one time, at the very beginning of their cable service, when they
uploaded a broken firmware to my modem (remotely) and the modem was f**d, i
have nothing to complain about their service neither.
everything works fine
Once in a while they have short routing problems, but
nothing major.
i haven't experienced anything the like yet.
and neither have i experienced any unscheduled downtimes, or sudden-high-pings
or the like (as i had been _constantly_ experiencing with p&t adsl...)
The only annoying thing is that all their traffic
still goes through
Brussels ... and when I open my browser, I end up on google.be ... in
dutch !
yup, that is annoying :-)
but i can live with it (change your preferences in google and you'll see
google.lu in whatever lang you like)
- --
regards,
Georges Toth
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAwC8d8pWPvwUjUA0RAg6wAKDEQ1OCMLFeZd/vUoy2x9a9juVRrwCfZ04Q
gvgAoILPvEZ1PyZJKNPDmkw=
=PhIz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
10:32 p.m.
On Fri, 2004-06-04 at 10:13, Georges Toth wrote:
George, please specify...
AFAIR you have a static IP... I have a feeling they treat those users
differently.
I'm using dynamic IP and sometimes __during a session__ the DNS suddenly
loses adresses or routes or whatever memory disease it has.
I'm _connected_ to linux.lu or yahoo or whatever, I click on an inside
linke or just refresh the page and it can't find the server any more,
doesn't remember it's IP and can't find it.
I open a shell, do a few pings and suddenly the DNS remembers...
Serge
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Serge Marelli, Luxembourg
E-mail : serge.marelli(a)linux.lu
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LiLux, Luxembourg LUG : http://www.linux.lu/
Defending Innovation against Patent Inflation http://swpat.ffii.org/
Once in a
while they have short routing problems, but nothing major.
i haven't experienced anything the like yet.
and neither have i experienced any unscheduled downtimes, or sudden-high-pings
or the like (as i had been _constantly_ experiencing with p&t adsl...) 
5 Jun
5 Jun
8:09 a.m.
Hi,
On Sat, 5 Jun 2004, Serge Marelli wrote:
I'm using dynamic IP and sometimes __during a
session__ the DNS suddenly
loses adresses or routes or whatever memory disease it has.
I'm _connected_ to linux.lu or yahoo or whatever, I click on an inside
linke or just refresh the page and it can't find the server any more,
doesn't remember it's IP and can't find it.
I open a shell, do a few pings and suddenly the DNS remembers...
Not sure if that's going to help, maybe I'm completely off base...
but do you run "nscd" (name service cache daemon)? That one might
help with these problems - if it doesn't generate problems of it's
own (which I've also seen).
Also, in case you want to have fun with your internal network (that
is, if you're crazy enough to want to play with this), you may
consider to set up your own local DNS (I confess... I did so, even
at home). That should rid you of any DNS problems with Coditel.
Greets Eric
4 Jun
4 Jun
10:25 p.m.
On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 22:39, Patrick LEMMERS wrote:
Once in a while they have short routing problems, but
nothing major.
The only annoying thing is that all their traffic still goes through
Brussels ... and when I open my browser, I end up on google.be ... in
dutch !
That's annoying, however I fixed that by selecting the English language
link (i.e. google.com) and told Mozilla to keep this cookie :)
Worked with K-sumptin as well
Serge
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Serge Marelli, Luxembourg
E-mail : serge.marelli(a)linux.lu
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LiLux, Luxembourg LUG : http://www.linux.lu/
Defending Innovation against Patent Inflation http://swpat.ffii.org/
21 Jul
21 Jul
5:03 p.m.
New subject: KDM startup problems
Can anyone give me some advice on how to begin debugging a KDM startup
problem?
Whenever I turn on my PC, it boots normally, starts X successfully, and then
TRIES to start KDM. It hangs just after it changes the curser to a watch,
but still leaving the ugly grey X background.
If I switch to another VTY, and change the run level to a non graphical level,
then change it back again, KDM works perfectly. Likewise, if I do a ps -A
and kill the first instance of kdm, it starts up without further problems.
After it has successfully started up, I never have any further problems with
it.
The only changes that I have made to the system is to install the debian
version of Grub. I am running SuSE 8.2, but have upgraded kde to 3.2.
Mike
5:06 p.m.
New subject: KDM startup problems
Mike Pressel wrote:
If I switch to another VTY, and change the run level
to a non graphical level,
then change it back again, KDM works perfectly. Likewise, if I do a ps -A
and kill the first instance of kdm, it starts up without further problems.
After it has successfully started up, I never have any further problems with
it.
which makes me _guess_ that the problem lays in an init script. not sure
thought.
would you mind attaching some relevant log files?
Friendly,
Bob Hentges
--
http://bob.hentges.lu/
9:01 p.m.
New subject: KDM startup problems
I would love too, but what's relevant? I'm completely lost with most system
admin things (thus why I'm using SuSE in the first place).
On Wednesday 21 July 2004 19:06, Bob Hentges wrote:
Mike Pressel wrote:
If I switch to another VTY, and change the run
level to a non graphical
level, then change it back again, KDM works perfectly. Likewise, if I do
a ps -A and kill the first instance of kdm, it starts up without further
problems. After it has successfully started up, I never have any further
problems with it.
which makes me _guess_ that the problem lays in an init script. not sure
thought.
would you mind attaching some relevant log files?
Friendly,
Bob Hentges
--
http://bob.hentges.lu/
_______________________________________________
Lilux-help mailing list
Lilux-help(a)lilux.lu
http://lilux.lu/mailman/listinfo/lilux-help
25 Jul
25 Jul
12:16 a.m.
New subject: KDM startup problems
What about launching kdm prefixed with strace and having a look at which
system call hangs or what happens when the kdm starts looping ???
# strace kdm 2> somefile &
# vi somefile
Just my 0.01 eurocent...
On Wednesday 21 July 2004 19:06, Bob Hentges wrote:
>Mike Pressel wrote:
>
>
>>If I switch to another VTY, and change the run level to a non graphical
>>level, then change it back again, KDM works perfectly. Likewise, if I do
>>a ps -A and kill the first instance of kdm, it starts up without further
>>problems. After it has successfully started up, I never have any further
>>problems with it.
>>
>>
--
Brent Frère
Private e-mail: Brent(a)BFrere.net
Postal address: 5, rue de Mamer
L-8280 Kehlen
Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg
European Union
Mobile: +352-021/29.05.98
Fax: +352-26.30.05.96
Home: +352-307.341
URL: http://BFrere.net
4 Jun
4 Jun
10:23 p.m.
On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 21:32, Mike Pressel wrote:
A few days ago, I believe someone was speaking about
Coditel's internet
services. For those who have it, what has been your experience with Coditel?
My primary concerns are 1) quality of the service (unexplained down time,
mail servers down, too many users on one shared segment...) and 22) does the
USB modem that they offer work with linux or would I have to go out and get
myself a nice little linksys or Cisco router?
Hi,
I have been using it since about February and I'll respond to the
questions in reverse order :)
2) you would probably have a choice of at least two modems (I did), one
was a USB only modem (not good) the other was an USB/Ethernet modem, I
chose that one, disregarded the USB and connected it to my ethernet
adapter... no driver, no problem, no hassle works like a breeze
1) QoS :
- in the past (almost) 5 month I have had 2 periods of real down-time,
lasted 1 night the first time, 1 day the second (both were in early
March)
- I also had a problem with them in the past 10 days (I was the one who
complained) when they suddenly decided to lock port 25 (SMTP) without
warning; no notice, no response. I called the helpline... no use as
usual (see below), I was lucky this time as they acknowledged the
existence of a problem, however no help available and they never got
back to me about this... [I found a solution or a workaround with Eric's
help]
- the helpline : forget it, most of the time they don't know what
they're talking about; they insisted on me reinstalling the windows
drivers for my modem and ethernet adapter and reconfiguring the IP; they
also insisted that I must be having problems with the latest windows
virus (which one was it in March?) -- even though I'd told them I was
using Linux. When I said I might use Linux or Windows they assumed I
have a router and were going to refuse to support me... I had to
painfully explain to them the concepts of dual-boot (they know "about"
Linux, but it's not in their checklists...)
Detail : I'm using what they used to refer to as Coditel.net which seems
to have been renamed into SpeedClick; this is 128k/1M with 10G per month
and dynamic IP all for 47EUR/month - I'm a private user, this is not for
professional use.
All in all it's way cheaper than ADSL (except if you got Thierry's
connections) and pretty reliable.
One point tho', in the past 3 days I seem to have noticed some
degradation in performance (speed and DNS response) in the early evening
(around 12-14h and 17-19h) but I need to investigate that to make sure
it is so and I don't often use the Net at noon.
Serge
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Serge Marelli, Luxembourg
E-mail : serge.marelli(a)linux.lu
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LiLux, Luxembourg LUG : http://www.linux.lu/
Defending Innovation against Patent Inflation http://swpat.ffii.org/
6 Jun
6 Jun
9:29 p.m.
Serge Marelli a écrit :
[...]
Detail : I'm using what they used to refer to as
Coditel.net which
seemsto have been renamed into SpeedClick; this is 128k/1M with 10G
per month and dynamic IP all for 47EUR/month - I'm a private user,
this is not for professional use.
Alternet proposes 128/256K ADSL with dynamic IP address @ 33
Euros/month, with a subsidised Ethernet ADSL router. Fully compliant
with Linux, no download limit. They are available everywhere EPT is
available (they use EPT ADSL DSLAMs if you are our of their own coverage
for the same price).
Perfect for me. Installed several times for me, my company and
customers. No availability, filtering or performance problems so far. No
stupid help-desk answer so far. At least, they understand that you can
USE a Linux-based computer and they accept to support it. This is my
experience.
They are fully aware of GNU/Linux/FOSS issue. They use internally
StarOffice...
--
Brent Frère
Private e-mail: Brent(a)BFrere.net
Postal address: 5, rue de Mamer
L-8280 Kehlen
Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg
European Union
Mobile: +352-021/29.05.98
Fax: +352-26.30.05.96
Home: +352-307.341
URL: http://BFrere.net
7 Jun
7 Jun
5:20 p.m.
On Sun, 2004-06-06 at 23:29, Brent Frère wrote:
Serge Marelli a écrit :
[...]
too slow, too expensive
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Serge Marelli, Luxembourg
E-mail : serge.marelli(a)linux.lu
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LiLux, Luxembourg LUG : http://www.linux.lu/
Defending Innovation against Patent Inflation http://swpat.ffii.org/
Detail : I'm using what they used to refer
to as Coditel.net which
seemsto have been renamed into SpeedClick; this is 128k/1M with 10G
per month and dynamic IP all for 47EUR/month - I'm a private user,
this is not for professional use.
Alternet proposes 128/256K ADSL with dynamic IP address @ 33
Euros/month, with a subsidised Ethernet ADSL router. Fully compliant 
5 Jun
5 Jun
10:34 a.m.
Mike Pressel wrote:
A few days ago, I believe someone was speaking about
Coditel's internet
services. For those who have it, what has been your experience with Coditel?
My primary concerns are 1) quality of the service (unexplained down time,
mail servers down, too many users on one shared segment...) and 22) does the
USB modem that they offer work with linux or would I have to go out and get
myself a nice little linksys or Cisco router?
Coditel works very well. I use it since June 2003 with almost no
problems (only problem was the blocked port 25 several days ago). Speed
is very good (only slightly slower compared to german T-DSL I used for 2
years in Germany).
I only thing your OS needs to support is ethernet and DHCP! Therefore
Coditel is compatible with every network capable modern OS!
Patrick Kaell
10:35 a.m.
Mike Pressel wrote:
A few days ago, I believe someone was speaking about
Coditel's internet
services. For those who have it, what has been your experience with Coditel?
My primary concerns are 1) quality of the service (unexplained down time,
mail servers down, too many users on one shared segment...) and 22) does the
USB modem that they offer work with linux or would I have to go out and get
myself a nice little linksys or Cisco router?
Coditel works very well. I use it since June 2003 with almost no
problems (only problem was the blocked port 25 several days ago). Speed
is very good (only slightly slower compared to german T-DSL I used for 2
years in Germany).
I only thing your OS needs to support is ethernet and DHCP! Therefore
Coditel is compatible with every network capable modern OS!
Patrick Kaell
7:13 p.m.
Mike Pressel wrote:
A few days ago, I believe someone was speaking about Coditel's internet
services. For those who have it, what has been your experience with Coditel?
My primary concerns are 1) quality of the service (unexplained down time,
mail servers down, too many users on one shared segment...) and 22) does the
USB modem that they offer work with linux or would I have to go out and get
myself a nice little linksys or Cisco router?
Ad 2: They gave me the USB/Ethernet cable modem; I only use the Ethernet
part. No trouble with this. Only an Ethernet card and DHCP required.
Ad 1: In the beginning I had some trouble with signal strength, thus I
did not have connection over hours every day. Calls to their Helpdesk
were adventourous:
Me : I have trouble with my connection . The "Cable-LED" is blinking
They: OK, go to Settings -> comntrol Panel etc.
Me: I use Linux, but the OS is not the problem, the "Cable LED" is
blinking.
They: Please reboot your system.
Me: That's impossible
They: Why would this be impossible?
Me: Because it is not started ;-))
They: So how can you tell you have trouble, if you have not even started
your PC?
Me: Because it's not worth starting it, as the "Cable LED" is blinking.
They: Oh, the Cable LED is blinking! That means, there is a problem on
our side
Me: That's why I call you.
They: Unfortunately, the technicians who can troubleshoot this only work
until 5PM. Try calling tomorrow morning
etc.
These troubles lasted pretty long, then they fiddled around on their
amplifiers, and things went better, but not perfect.
My connection is perfect since some NIMBY-minded neighbour forced
Coditel to take away their cables from the facade of his house, as he
didn't want cable TV any more, and they had to completely change their
cabling in the neighbourhood ...
(Thanks so far, neighbour)
Jean-Jacques MOURIS
7237
days inactive
7289
days old
24 comments
13 participants
participants (13)
-
Alain Knaff -
Bob Hentges -
Brent Frère -
Eric Dondelinger -
Georges Toth -
Jean-Jacques Mouris -
Kymon MacDaire -
Mike Pressel -
Pascal Steichen -
Patrick Kaell -
Patrick Kaell -
Patrick LEMMERS -
Serge Marelli