16 Jul
2007
16 Jul
'07
5:40 p.m.
Hello
I ran apt-get update followed by an apt-get upgrade. It answers with making
all found upgrades except one, where apt-get writes:
Following packages are kept back:
Why doesn't it do the update? An apt-get dist-upgrade solves the
'problem'.
Thanx for your reply.
Al
23 Jul
23 Jul
7:51 a.m.
There is a way (at least through the GUI) to "lock" a package, meaning
to prevent it from being upgraded.
We use this to prevent some buggy upgrades to happens automatically.
Maybe you should look that direction ?
Alex L wrote:
Hello
I ran apt-get update followed by an apt-get upgrade. It answers with making
all found upgrades except one, where apt-get writes:
Following packages are kept back:
Why doesn't it do the update? An apt-get dist-upgrade solves the
'problem'.
Thanx for your reply.
Al
_______________________________________________
Lilux-help mailing list
Lilux-help(a)lilux.lu
http://lilux.lu/mailman/listinfo/lilux-help
--
Brent Frère
Private e-mail: Brent(a)BFrere.net
Postal address: 58, rue d'Esch
L-3720 Rumelange
Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg
European Union
Phone: +352-20.20.22.69
Fax: +352-26.30.05.96
URL: http://BFrere.net
This e-mail signature can be checked if you have the CaCERT certificate installed.
Check http://www.CaCERT.org for details.
7:55 a.m.
Quoting Brent Frere <Brent(a)BFrere.net>et>:
There is a way (at least through the GUI) to
"lock" a package, meaning
to prevent it from being upgraded.
We use this to prevent some buggy upgrades to happens automatically.
Maybe you should look that direction ?
Yes, indeed. Is there a possibility to check the changes, before the
upgreade, to check what changes in upgrading the package, like in SuSE?
Al
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
8:10 a.m.
# man apt-get
[...]
Options :
[...]
-s N'agit pas. Réalise uniquement une simulation de commande
[...]
alex(a)loes.org.lu wrote:
Quoting Brent Frere <Brent(a)BFrere.net>et>:
--
Brent Frère
Private e-mail: Brent(a)BFrere.net
Postal address: 58, rue d'Esch
L-3720 Rumelange
Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg
European Union
Phone: +352-20.20.22.69
Fax: +352-26.30.05.96
URL: http://BFrere.net
This e-mail signature can be checked if you have the CaCERT certificate installed.
Check http://www.CaCERT.org for details.
There is a way (at least through the GUI) to
"lock" a package, meaning
to prevent it from being upgraded.
We use this to prevent some buggy upgrades to happens automatically.
Maybe you should look that direction ?
Yes, indeed. Is there a possibility to check the changes, before the
upgreade, to check what changes in upgrading the package, like in SuSE?
Al
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. 
29 Jul
29 Jul
8:39 p.m.
Le lundi 16 juillet 2007 à 19:40 +0200, Alex L a écrit :
Hello
I ran apt-get update followed by an apt-get upgrade. It answers with making
all found upgrades except one, where apt-get writes:
Following packages are kept back:
Why doesn't it do the update? An apt-get dist-upgrade solves the
'problem'.
That's exactly the expected behaviour:
"dist-upgrade" is obviously
different from "upgrade". Why would developers bother creating two
different options.
"upgrade" means "upgrade any single package".
"dist-upgrade" means "upgrade even if the package list of the system has
to change".
So, your upgrade is just depending on an extra package compared to the
current situation.
Hope it helps.
Thanx for your reply.
Al
--
Jérôme Warnier
FLOSS Consultant
http://beeznest.net
6138
days inactive
6151
days old
4 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Alex L -
alex＠loes.org.lu
-
Brent Frere -
Jerome Warnier